ABSTRACT
Objectives: COVID-19 had an impact on health care, including diagnostics. Early diagnosis of MM is a critical factor for prognosis. We examined the impact of COVID-19 on incidence of NDMM patients and on characteristics in NDMM patients in US and in Germany. Method(s): 44,164 NDMM patients were identified in TriNetX federated network across 55 healthcare organizations in US between January 2018 and December 2021. A bivariate analysis examined changes in patient characteristics in two cohorts before (Cohort 1;n=25513) and after (Cohort 2;n=18.651) the start of the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020. 4172 NDMM patients were identified in the German database in a sample of across >100 healthcare organizations in the same time period. Similarly, bivariate analysis examined changes in patient characteristics before (Cohort 1;n=2252) and after (Cohort 2;n=1920) the start of pandemic. Result(s): Analysis of US data showed a significant decrease in incidence of NDMM. Bivariate analysis revealed that NDMM patients in Cohort 2 have a significantly higher risk profile compared with patients in Cohort 1, higher incidence of renal failure (13.5% v. 15.43%), heart failure (10.3% v 11.26%), bone lesions (12.6% v. 13.05%) and anemia (26.8% v. 29.75%). The German data indicated an increased risk profile in Cohort 2, with higher reporting of renal impairment (12.3% v. 15.5%) and cardiac impairment (8.3% v. 10.9%). The higher risk profile was reflected in a significant increase of all SLiM-CRAB criteria, notably hypercalcemia (24.1 % v. 36.9%), bone marrow plasma cell infiltration (28.1% v. 36.8%) and free light chain involvement (27.3% v. 41.3%). Conclusion(s): The results provide real-world evidence of a change in risk profile for patients with NDMM during COVID-19. This higher risk profile is observed in both the US and Germany, and may negatively impact outcomes such as progression-free and five-year overall survival.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Background: During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, established best practices in cancer care were modified to diminish the risk of COVID-19 infection among patients and health-care workers. Objective(s): We aimed to study the modifications in cancer-directed therapy during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Material(s) and Method(s): A cross-sectional study of patients with cancers of the head and neck, thoracic, urologic, and central nervous systems who visited the medical oncology department of the Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India, between April 22, 2020 and June 01, 2020, was conducted. Data were prospectively collected in an online pro forma and supplemented from the electronic medical records. Result(s): Of a total of 514 patients, 363 (71%) were men. The most common malignancy was lung cancer in 234 patients (46%). Cancer-directed therapy was modified in 83 patients (16%). Deviations consisted of modification of the chemotherapy regimen (48%), temporary discontinuation of chemotherapy in 37%, and interim chemotherapy to delay surgery in 5%. Changes in the chemotherapy regimen included a shift to a less intensive regimen in 45%, changing from intravenous to oral in 40%, and less frequent dosing of immunotherapy in 7%. Considering missed appointments as a deviation from planned cancer therapy, 68% of patients had a deviation in the standard planned cancer care. Conclusion(s): Almost two-thirds of the patients could not reach the hospital during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown in India. Of those who could reach the hospital, one of out every six patients with cancer had a change in their cancer-directed treatment, half of which consisted of a modification in the standard chemotherapy regimens. The effects of these therapy deviations are likely to be long-lasting. (Clinical Trials Registry-India, CTRI/2020/07/026533).Copyright © 2023 Neurology India, Neurological Society of India Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: Besides in-centre ECMO care, the certificated ECMO centre of the University Hospital Regensburg (UKR) offers out-of-centre ECMO initiation with mobile equipment. During the pandemic situation, this treatment was especially meant for patients with critical cardiopulmonary failure in remote hospitals who present themselves as too unstable for interhospital transfer. We evaluated if treatment with outof-centre ECMO initiation could benefit patients;outcome, by comparing this group with a group of COVID-19 patients who received ECMO therapy at the UKR by in-hospital initiation. Method(s): Retrospective single-centre study including 169 patients who received ECMO due to COVID-19- induced cardiopulmonary failure between March 2020 till March 2022. Patients;population was separated into two groups according to the location of ECMO initiation, out-of-centre or in-centre, and into two subgroups by the used ECMO mode, venovenous (VV) or venoarterial (VA). We compared demographics, treatment duration, adverse events and patient;s outcome. The primary endpoint of the investigation was patients;survival to hospital discharge rate or death on ECMO or after ECMO explant. Result(s): Regarding the total study population, 98 (58.0%) of the 169 patients could be discharged from the UKR. Before initiation of ECMO therapy and with regard to complications during the course of intensive care, such as renal failure requiring dialysis or bleeding, there were no relevant differences between the two groups and subgroups. The out-of-centre group showed a significantly higher survival rate with 70 (63.6%) survivors out of 110 externally cannulated patients. Conclusion(s): In the study population, external ECMO cannulation was beneficial in terms of survival, although the reasons did not show significant differences between the groups. A possible approach for the good overall survival of the study groups in international comparison could be the existing centre expertise. (Figure Presented).
ABSTRACT
Background/Objectives: SARS-CoV-2 infection clinical manifestations hugely vary among patients, ranging from no symptoms, to life-threatening conditions. This variability is also due to host genetics: COVID-19 Host Genetics Initiative identified six loci associated with COVID-19 severity in a previous case-control genome-wide association study. A different approach to investigate the genetics of COVID-19 severity is looking for variants associated with mortality, e.g. by analyzing the association between genotypes and time-to-event data. Method(s): Here we perform a case-only genome-wide survival analysis, of 1,777 COVID-19 patients from the GEN-COVID cohort, 60 days after infection/hospitalization. Case-only studies has the advantage of eliminating selection biases and confounding related to control subjects. Patients were genotyped using Illumina Infinium Global Screening Arrays. PLINK software was used for data quality check and principal component analysis. GeneAbel R package was used for survival analysis and age, sex and the first four principal components were used as covariates in the Cox proportional hazard model. Result(s): We found four variants associated with COVID-19 patient survival at a nominal P < 1.0 x 10-6. Their minor alleles were associated with a higher mortality risk (i.e. hazard ratios (HR)>1). In detail, we observed: HR=1.03 for rs28416079 on chromosome 19 (P=1.34 x 10-7), HR=1.15 for rs72815354 on chromosome 10 (P=1.66 x 10-7), HR=2.12 for rs2785631 on chromosome 1 (P=5.14 x 10-7), and HR=2.27 for rs2785631 on chromosome 5 (P=6.65 x 10-7). Conclusion(s): The present results suggest that germline variants are COVID-19 prognostic factors. Replication in the remaining HGI COVID-19 patient cohort (EGAS00001005304) is ongoing at the time of submission.
ABSTRACT
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic impacted the delivery of cancer care and outcomes in the United States (US). We examined the association between time-varying state-level weekly COVID19 mortality and progression-free survival (rwPFS), time to progression (rwTTP), and survival (rwOS) among pts with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (advNSCLC). Method(s): This retrospective study used the nationwide Flatiron Health electronic health recordderived de-identified database. The cohort included community oncology pts diagnosed with advNSCLC between March 1, 2020 and December 31, 2021 (follow-up through March 30, 2022). We extracted US data on COVID-19 deaths from the COVID-19 Data Repository by the Center for Systems Science and Engineering at Johns Hopkins University. We calculated state-level weekly COVID-19 death rates as weekly COVID-19 deaths per state population size from the 2019 American Community Survey. We categorized rates into quintiles based on all weekly rates during the observation period. Analyses were restricted to treated pts and indexed to start of first-line therapy. For rwPFS analyses, first occurrence of progression or death was considered an event, and pts were censored at last clinic note date. For rwTTP, only progression (not death) was considered an event, and pts with no event were censored at last clinic note date. For rwOS analyses, pts who did not die were censored at last structured activity. We used Cox proportional hazards models to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for associations between weekly time-varying state-level COVID-19 mortality rates and outcomes of rwPFS, rwTTP, and rwOS, adjusted for age at diagnosis, race/ethnicity, and state. Result(s): Among 7,813 advNSCLC pts, the median age at diagnosis was 70 years, the majority of the cohort was non-Hispanic White (59%), had non-squamous cell histology (68%) and a history of smoking (87%). Compared to pts living in states with the lowest quintile of COVID-19 mortality rates (Q1), pts living in states with the highest COVID-19 mortality (Q5) had worse rwOS (Q5 vs. Q1: HR 1.46, 95% CI 1.26-1.69) and rwPFS (Q5 vs. Q1: HR 1.18, 95% CI 1.05-1.33). No association was observed with rwTTP (Q5 vs. Q1: HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.90-1.22). Conclusion(s): In this study of real-world oncology data, we demonstrated the use of publicly-available COVID-19 mortality data to measure the time-varying impact of COVID-19 severity on outcomes in pts with advNSCLC. Higher state-level COVID-19 mortality rates were associated with worse rwOS and rwPFS among advNSCLC pts. The association with increased mortality among pts with advNSCLC may be related to COVID-19-related mortality or other factors such as pre-existing comorbidities which were not explored in this study.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation has been widely used in patients with severe respiratory failure due to Covid-19 infection. ECMO was initiated at ECMO center or implantation performed in regional hospitals and patients transferred to ECMO center for further treatment. The aim of the study was to evaluate characteristics and outcomes of patients retrieved with ECMO versus thoseimplanted in our institution. Method(s): Retrospective, single center study. Data of all Covid-19 patients, supported with ECMO from 2020.04.01 to 2022.06.01 in our institution were evaluated. Data of patients retrieved on ECMO to our hospital were compared with data of patients when ECMO support was initiated at our institution. Result(s): During Covid-19 pandemic 54 patients with severe respiratory failure were supported with ECMO. Out of them 24(44.4%) patients were retrieved on ECMO. In all patient VV configuration was used. There were no significant differences of preoperative characteristics between retrieved vs institutionally cannulated patients (mean age 44 +/- 16 vs 45 +/- 12 years, pre-ECMO arterial pO2 62 +/- 16 vs 66 +/- 14 mmHg, pre-ECMO mechanical ventilation 2.1 vs 2.2 days). The overall survival to hospital discharge was 32%, 33% in patients retrieved with ECMO vs 30% in the group of patients with ECMO implantation on site. Conclusion(s): Patient characteristics and hospital survival of patients who were retrieved with implanted ECMO to our ECMO center were comparable to those patients with ECMO implantation on site.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: To present a series of immunosuppressed patients (oncohematological disease, congenital immunosuppression, hematopoietic stem cell (HSCT), and solid organ transplant) assisted on ECMO. Method(s): Descriptive, retrospective study (2011-2020) of a cohort of 9 immunosuppressed patients, supported on ECMO. Medical records were reviewed and demographic, clinical, and analytical variables were collected. Result(s): In our series of 9 patients, 5 were male, the median age was 8 years [RIC 3-11 years]. Considering the underlying disease, 6 were oncologic, 1 liver transplant and 2 with congenital immunodeficiency after HSCT. 4 were under active chemotherapy (median 6 days after the last cycle [RIC 5-188]). 6 were admitted due to acute respiratory failure, 3 due to hemodynamic instability (3/9), (one septic shock). The median PEEP was 12 [RIC 9-15] and FiO2 100% (81-100%). 78% (6) required vasoactive drugs (median inotropic score 35 [RIC 0-75]. 40%. 5 had severe neutropenia and/or plateletopenia in the 24 hours prior to ECMO, and alterations in acid-base balance (median pH 7. 1 [RIC 6.9-7.15]. 5 were on multiorgan failure. TPrimary ECMO transport was performed in 4 patients (44%). Cannulation was peripheral in 80% (57% cervical, 43% femoral) and central in 20%;70% VA-ECMO. Median time of assistance was 15 days [RIC 3.5-31.5] in cardiac ECMO (4), and 29 days [RIC 13.5-42] and in pulmonary ECMO (n=5). The median total time of admission was 45 days [RIC 27-59]. 9 had an infection, 2 COVID after HSCT, and 8 bleeding complications, but only one required surgical revision. Renal replacement therapy was used in 5 (median 9 days [RIC 5-34.5]). Other therapies used were polymyxin hemadsorption(2), intratracheal surfactant(2), plasma exchange(1), infusion of mesenchymal cells(1) and specific memory T lymphocytes(2). 4 patients died, 5 survived decannulation, 2 died later, with an overall survival rate to hospital discharge of 33% (3/9). Conclusion(s): Despite having a worse prognosis, ECMO can increase survival in immunosuppressed patients, in situations that are challenging and require a multidisciplinary approach.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi) are used extensively within the NHS to treat specific B-cell malignancies with patients stopping BTKi usually due to adverse events or disease progression. The objective of this study was to analyse effectiveness of BTKi therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) at our centre compared to previously published real-world data from the UKCLL Forum (Follows et al, Blood 2019). In addition, we investigated treatment-related adverse events (AE) and second malignancies. Method(s): This is a single-centre retrospective study of 112 CLL patients treated with a BTKi for a minimum of 4 weeks between 2014 and 2022 (ibrutinib n = 71, acalabrutinib n = 38, zanubrutinib n = 3). Treatment was first line (n = 39), second line (n = 44) and 3+ line (n = 29). Patient demographics, duration of BTKi therapy, Aes, discontinuation reasons and second malignancies were collected. Aes were compared with a parallel cohort of 53 non-CLL BTKi-treated patients. Result(s): Median age starting treatment was 73 years, and 71% were male. Primary outcomes were discontinuation-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). With a median follow-up of 3.90 years, the median DFS was 4.18 years (95% CI: 3.52-4.91) with a median OS of 6.35 years (95% CI: 5.52-NA). These compare favourably with previous UKCLL forum data (median DFS = 2.79 years;median OS = 4.66 years), although our patients were more likely to receive BTKi earlier in treatment (3rd line or beyond: 26% of our patients vs. 78% in the UKCLL Forum). The most common Aes included bleeding, cytopenia, infection, cardiac events and mouth ulcers, with 21% stopping BTKi for CLL due to Aes whilst 15% of non-CLL BTKi patients stopped due to an AE. Second malignancies were reported in 49% of CLL patients, yet only 34% of non-CLL patients. Among patients with a confirmed cause of death, infection was the most common cause (39%), followed by CLL (33%), then second malignancy (18%). Of the 31 deaths in 2020 and 2021, 7/31 (23%) were due to, or in association with COVID-19 infection. No COVID-19 deaths were associated with BTKi in non-CLL patients. Conclusion(s): We demonstrate a favourable real-world DFS and OS for BTKi-treated CLL patients although a high number of patients still stop BTKi due to Aes. The very high incidence of second malignancies for all BTKi-treated patients and COVID-19 and infection-related deaths for CLL patients is concerning. As CLL is known to associate with high levels of second cancers, it remains unclear whether BTKi use increases this risk further.
ABSTRACT
Ablation includes ethanol injection, radiofrequency ablation (RFA), microwave ablation (MWA), etc. Ablation can be potentially curative, minimally invasive and easily repeatable for recurrence. RFA has been the most widely used ablation technique for liver tumors. The new-generation MWA system incorporating antenna cooling and high-power generation has attracted attention. It can create a more predictable ablation zone and a larger ablation volume in a shorter procedure time. Many high-volume centers have introduced new-generation MWA in Japan. However, many studies failed to show that new-generation MWA is superior to RFA in terms of local control and overall survival. In MWA, clinical data have been insufficient compared with those of RFA. There has been keen competition between surgical resection and ablation for almost 40 years since the era of ethanol injection. In 2021, SURF trial revealed that overall survival and recurrence-free survival were not significantly different between surgical resection and RFA. SURF trial was a multicenter randomized controlled trial in which 49 major centers in Japan enrolled patients with good hepatic function (Child-Pugh scores <= 7) and primary HCC of largest diameter <= 3 cm, and <= 3 nodules during the 6-year period of 2009-2015. The registered patients were followed for at least 5 years. As the result of SURF trial and other comparative studies, the revised Japanese clinical practice guidelines in 2021 treats hepatic resection and ablation equally for patients with <= 3 lesions, <= 3 cm in diameter. Recently, the combination of systemic and locoregional therapies has been attracting much attention. Systemic therapy using molecular targeted agents or immune checkpoint inhibitors is used for advanced HCC which cannot be treated by surgery or ablation. On the other hand, some locoregional therapies, such as hepatectomy and ablation, are potentially curative, but they cannot be indicated for advanced HCC. Combination of both therapies is an approach to improve the prognosis of advanced HCC, which is not indicated for curative treatment. Systemic therapy is used to shrink the tumor, and then locoregional therapies are performed to eradicate it. The combination may build a new strategy for advanced HCC. Ablation is highly operator-dependent. The skills and outcomes are very different from operator to operator. Before the pandemic of COVID-19, we held domestic and international training programs for intermediate and advanced doctors and hands-on seminars for young doctors. These were activities to exchange knowledge and experience and standardize the procedure. During the pandemic, we cannot get together. Since August 2020, we have conducted Japan Ablation Webinar 8 times with a total of 1,566 participants. We have also conducted International Ablation Webinar 4 times with a total of 1,272 participated doctors. Education is important to acquire skills and knowledge for successful ablation. We have established Japan Academy of Tumor Ablation (JATA) this year. There are two triggers. One is that SURF trial revealed that there is no difference between hepatectomy and ablation. The other is that ablation for lung, bone and soft tissue and kidney cancers has become reimbursed with health insurance since this September.
ABSTRACT
GCSF prophylaxis is recommended in patients on chemotherapy with a >20% risk of febrile neutropenia and is to be considered if there is an intermediate risk of 10−20%. GCSF has been suggested as a possible adjunct to immunotherapy due to increased peripheral neutrophil recruitment and PD-L1 expression on neutrophils with GCSF use and greater tumour volume decrease with higher tumour GCSF expression. However, its potential to increase neutrophil counts and, thus, NLR values, could subsequently confer poorer prognoses on patients with advanced NSCLC. This analysis follows on from the retrospective multicentre observational cohort Spinnaker study on advanced NSCLC patients. The primary endpoints were OS and PFS. The secondary endpoints were the frequency and severity of AEs and irAEs. Patient information, including GCSF use and NLR values, was collected. A secondary comparison with matched follow-up duration was also undertaken. Three hundred and eight patients were included. Median OS was 13.4 months in patients given GCSF and 12.6 months in those not (p = 0.948). Median PFS was 7.3 months in patients given GCSF and 8.4 months in those not (p = 0.369). A total of 56% of patients receiving GCSF had Grade 1−2 AEs compared to 35% who did not receive GCSF (p = 0.004). Following an assessment with matched follow-up, 41% of patients given GCSF experienced Grade 1−2 irAEs compared to 23% of those not given GCSF (p = 0.023). GCSF prophylaxis use did not significantly affect overall or progression-free survival. Patients given GCSF prophylaxis were more likely to experience Grade 1−2 adverse effects and Grade 1−2 immunotherapy-related adverse effects.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions , Lung Neoplasms , Humans , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/pathology , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Progression-Free Survival , Immunotherapy/adverse effects , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
Objective. To comparatively assess the early toxicity of treatment, its tolerability, 1-, 2-, 3-year overall survival, and local regional control rates in a group of patients receiving a radical cycle of accelerated or conventional fractionation chemoradiotherapy. Subjects and methods. The paper presents the interim results of a prospective study that included 115 patients with locally advanced cancer of the oropharynx, tongue root, and larynx who received a radical cycle of conformal chemoradiotherapy using accelerated (the single focal dose (SFD) was 2.4 Gy for 25-26 fractions) or conventional (SFD was 2.0 Gy for 32-33 fractions) fractionation in the period from 2015 to 2020. Results. An analysis comparing the study group with the control one revealed no statistically significant differences in the level of early toxicity of treatment (p=0.41). Complete tumor reversal was achieved in 57 (86.3%) patients in the study group and in 39 (79.5%) in the comparison group (p=0.23). The 1-, 2-, and 3-year local regional control rates in the accelerated fractionation group was 78.3+/-5.3%;65.9+/-6.8%, and 54.5+/-9.2%, respectively. The 3-year overall survival rate was 80.4+/-7.4%. These rates did not differ statistically from those in the conventional radiotherapy group (p=0.12-0.82);53 (80.3%) patients in the study group and 37 (75.5%) in the standard fractionation group received a radiation cycle without a forced interval. The treatment interval in the patients of both groups reduced the 2-year local regional control rates by 30.2% compared to that in the continuous cycle group (p=0.02). Conclusion. Accelerated fractionation chemoradiotherapy (SFD was 2.4 Gy for 25-26 fractions, the daily focal dose was 60.0- 62.4 Gy) is a procedure comparable with conventional radiation in its direct efficiency and safety. During the COVID-19 pandemic, this regimen can be considered to be a mainstay for patients with locally advanced oropharyngeal cancer in order to preserve the previous volumes of specialized healthcare.Copyright © A.V. SEMENOV I.A. GULIDOV O.G. LEPILINA M.U. RADZHAPOVA F.E. SEVRYUKOV K.B. GORDON.
ABSTRACT
Background: Breats cancer is a major health problem in elderly ( >= 70 years) women. Increase incidence with age and the progressive increase in life expectancy mean that the numbers in elderly breast cancer diagnosis are increasing. These patients do not always receive the proper treatment and despite this the survival of this population is not always depends on cancer, there are other competing causes of death typical of the aging population. Method(s): A retrospective observational analysis of women >= age 70 diagnosed with breast carcinoma in HUPHM between 2014 and 2020 was made. Clinical, pathological data and stages at diagnosis were analyzed. We checked our patients with the national death center (official national registry) thus obtaining an exact date of death and the cause of death. Data updated in January 2023 , ensuring a minimum follow-up of 24 months. We excluded deaths from Covid or of unknown cause to avoid bias. Result(s): A total of 421 patients were analyzed, mean age of 78.6 years and median follow-up of 48 months. 28% of patients had died at the time of analysis, 11% due to cancer and 17% from other causes. If we analyze the population deceased by cancer, no deaths are detected in patients diagnosed with carcinoma in situ (4% of the population), in stage I (30% of the population) the cumulative incidence of cancer death at 5 years is 3%, 7% In stage II (30% of the population), 15% in stage III (16%) and 70% in stage IV (12%). Death by other causes are more frequent in early breast cancer, the cumulative incidence at 5 years are 10% in stage I, 22% in stage II, 44% in satge III and just 10% in stage IV. The most frequent causes of death in this population were caridovascular events and infections. There are no differences in 5-year mortality according to histological subtypes 20%, 12%, 25% and 12% for triple negative, Rh+/HER2-, RH+/her2+ and RH-/HER2+ respectively. Conclusion(s): Although elderly patients do not receive optical treatments, mortality from cancer in early stages is incidental at 5 years, a different scenario is seen in metastatic disease in which the patient's prognosis depends mainly on the oncological disease, Therefore, an effort should be made in the treatment of these patients with metastatic breast cancer since adequate treatments can have a clearly positive impact on the survival of patients. Legal entity responsible for the study: The authors. Funding(s): Has not received any funding. Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Background: The emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic saw an increased use of cryopreserved (cryo) peripheral blood (PB) grafts for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Outcomes of patients receiving either fresh or cryo grafts have yielded heterogeneous results. Herein, we retrospectively compared the outcomes of patients receiving fresh and cryo grafts at a single center.(Table Presented)Methods: Between 2019 and 2021, we reviewed data from 380 patients;167 (44%) received a fresh, and 213 (56%) received a cryo graft. Patients underwent myeloablative or nonmyeloablative HSCT from either matched or mismatched, related or unrelated donors. Cell doses were determined by number of donor cells collected and recipient weight at infusion. Engraftment, disease risk (DR) and acute GVHD were classified based on established criteria. Donor chimerism was collected at approximately day 28 and day 80 after HSCT. Unadjusted and adjusted estimates of overall survival (OS), relapse, and non-relapse mortality (NRM) as a function of time were obtained. The adjusted odds (grades III-IV acute GVHD) and the adjusted cause-specific hazard of failure (all other outcomes) were compared between the 2 groups. with the use of logistic (Figure Presented) or Cox regression, respectively. These models were adjusted for various factors known to be associated with each outcome. Result(s): The characteristics of patients between the 2 groups are shown in Table 1. There was a higher proportion of patients with high/very high DR in the fresh graft group (Table 1). Median time to neutrophil engraftment was 17 and 18 days in fresh vs. cryo, respectively. The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of neutrophil engraftment (fresh vs. cryo) was 1.07 (95% CI, 0.86-1.34, p=0.54). Median time to platelet engraftment was 13 and 15 days, respectively, and the adjusted HR of platelet engraftment was 1.32 (1.06-1.65, p=0.01). Day 28 chimerism data were available for 272 patients (113 fresh and 159 cryo). At day 28, donor CD3 chimerism was below 50% in 5 out of 113 (4.4%) and 17 out of 159 (10.7%) patients receiving fresh and cryo grafts, respectively (p= 0.06). At day 80, 3 out of 121 (2.5%) patients in the fresh group and 4 out of 165 (2.4%) in the cryo group had CD3 chimerism below 50%. The adjusted HRs (fresh vs. cryo) for death and NRM were 0.83 (0.54-1.28, p=0.40) and 0.71 (0.38-1.33, p=0.29), respectively (Figures 1 and 2). The adjusted HR for relapse was 0.65 (0.42-0.99, p=0.05) (Figure 3). The adjusted odds ratio (fresh vs. cryo) for grades III-IV GVHD was 1.65 (0.94-2.9, p=0.07). Conclusion(s): In this single-center retrospective study we observed numerically better outcomes with fresh grafts relative to cryo grafts for all examined endpoints with the exception of grades III-IV aGVHD, although none of the differences were definitive with the possible exception of relapse and platelet engraftment. Further studies are needed to confirm our observations.Copyright © 2023 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy
ABSTRACT
The term "survival analysis" refers to statistical techniques for data analysis where the time until the occurrence of the desired event serves as the outcome variable. Time to event analysis is another name for survival analysis. Applications for survival analysis are fairly broad and include things like calculating a population's survival rate or contrasting the survival of two or more groups. Cox regression analysis is a highly well-liked and frequently applied technique among them. Data on disease states are typically obtained at random epochs or at periodic epochs during follow-up in research looking at biological changes between states of Coronavirus infection and the start of COVID-19 in the human immune system. For instance, after the COVID enters a person's bloodstream by a route of transmission, it progresses through numerous stages that are linked to the depletion of B cells before becoming COVID-19. This study presents the Cox's approach for simulating the link between variables influencing the development of two disease states, namely I= the time epoch of COVID infection and P= the time epoch of COVID-19. Incubation period (IP) or survival time is the precise interval of time between "P and I." It is shown how Cox's model works with several personal infective factors and how well it can estimate the percentage of COVID-19 victims with the same completed length of IP. Such forecast values are then established for a synthetically simulated data set. [ FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of Journal of Pharmaceutical Negative Results is the property of ResearchTrentz and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full . (Copyright applies to all s.)
ABSTRACT
Objectives: In the management of COVID-19, bio-inflammatory cytokines (IL-6 and others) can be measured as inflammatory markers to detect conditions in response to treatment, risk assessment, monitoring disease progression, prognosis determination and treatment selection. The purpose of this study is to identify changes in inflammation markers of COVID-19 patients and to determine whether it should be used as a prognosis marker. Materials-Methods: Three groups of the patients consisting of 138 patients (12 non-survived, 35 severe and 91 mild/moderate) aged 16 to 86 years who were diagnosed with COVID-19 by real-time polymerase chain reaction were included in the study. Acute phase serum levels such as CRP, D-Dimer, Ferritin, IL-1B and IL-6 were measured and compared in serum samples taken from these patients. It was examined whether these parameters can be a biomarker that can be monitored for the course of the disease. IL-6 and ferritin were measured with CLIA, D-dimer immunassay, CRP with photometry and IL1-B was measured with flow cytometry methods. Result(s): It has been observed that all parameters, except for ferritin (P=0.94), increase significantly during the transition from mild to severe form of the disease. (CRP P:0.005, D-Dimer P<0.0001, IL-1B P:0.03, IL-6 P:0.002). A significant difference was observed in the levels of CRP, IL-6 and D-Dimer in the patient survival. (P=0.003, P=0.03, P:0,0001). According to our results, the use of IL-1B in the prognosis monitoring of patients with severe forms was not found to be significant (P:0.48). ROC curve analysis showed that the area under the ROC curve (AUC) of CRP, D-Dimer and IL-6 was 0.645 (0,559 to 0,725), 0.637 (0,551 to 0,717) and 0.663 (0,577 to 0,741) respectively, and the cutoff values were >3.77 (sensitivity, 72.3%;specificity, 55%), >0.48 (sensitivity 68.1%;specificity, 57.1%) and <14.9 (sensitivity, 65,9%;specificity, 62.6%), respectively. Conclusion(s): Our results confirmed that the dynamic change in IL-6, CRP, D-Dimer can be used as a marker for disease monitoring in patients with severe COVID-19.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Advanced MZL is generally incurable, with periods of remission and relapse. Zanubrutinib (BGB-3111), a potent and highly specific next-generation Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor, was approved in the US and Canada for R/R MZL based on the MAGNOLIA primary analysis (BGB- 3111-214;NCT03846427);here, the final MAGNOLIA analysis is presented. Method(s): This was a phase 2, multicenter, single-arm study of adult patients (pts) with R/R MZL (>=1 prior CD20-directed therapy). Zanubrutinib (160 mg twice daily) was given until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) by independent review committee (IRC) per Lugano classification. Secondary endpoints were investigator-assessed ORR, duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Efficacy was assessed by positron emission tomography (PET)-based Lugano criteria for IRC-confirmed fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-avid disease at baseline;non-avid disease was assessed by computed tomography (CT)-based criteria. Result(s): As of May 4, 2022, 68 pts were treated (median age=70 y [range 37-95];>=75 y=27.9%). MZL subtypes included extranodal (38.2%), nodal (38.2%), splenic (17.6%), and unknown (5.9%). The median number of prior therapies was 2 (range 1-6);32.4% of pts had disease refractory to last therapy, most (89.7%) had prior chemoimmunotherapy, and 7 (10.3%) had rituximab monotherapy as their only prior treatment. Sixty-one pts (89.7%) had FDG-avid disease. After a median follow-up of 28.0 mos (range 1.6-32.9) and a median treatment duration of 24.2 mos (range 0.9-32.9), 66 pts were efficacy- evaluable. IRC-assessed ORR (complete response [CR]+partial response [PR]) was 68.2% (CR=25.8%). By subtype, (Figure Presented)(Figure Presented)ORR/CR rates were 64.0%/40.0% (extranodal), 76.0%/20.0% (nodal), 66.7%/8.3% (splenic), and 50.0%/25.0% (unknown). Median DOR, PFS, and OS were not reached. Over 70.0% of pts were alive or progression-free after 2 years (Figure). Sensitivity analysis using only CT-based criteria (n=66) showed an ORR of 66.7% and CR of 24.2%. The most common treatment-emergent AEs were bruising (23.5%), diarrhea (22.1%), and constipation (17.6%). Neutropenia (8.8%) and COVID-19 pneumonia (5.9%) were the most common Grade >=3 AEs. Five pts (7.4%) died due to unrelated AEs: COVID-19 pneumonia=2, acute myeloid leukemia=1, myocardial infarction=1, septic encephalopathy=1. Hypertension occurred in 3 pts (4.4%), atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter in 1 pt (1.5%) each;none led to treatment withdrawal. One pt (1.5%) had a Grade 3 gastrointestinal hemorrhage while receiving rivaroxaban. None of the pts required dose reduction. Conclusion(s): In this final analysis with over 2 years of median follow-up, zanubrutinib continues to demonstrate durable disease control and was generally well tolerated, with no new safety signals observedCopyright © 2023 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy
ABSTRACT
Background: The ZUMA-1 safety management Cohort 6 (N=40), which evaluated whether prophylactic corticosteroids and earlier corticosteroids and/or tocilizumab could improve safety outcomes, demonstrated an improved safety profile (no Grade >=3 cytokine release syndrome [CRS];15% Grade >=3 neurologic events [NEs]) vs pivotal Cohorts 1+2, without compromising response rate or durability (95% ORR, 80% CR rate, and 53% ongoing response rate with >=1 y of follow-up;Oluwole, et al. ASH 2021. 2832). Here, 2-y updated outcomes are reported. Method(s): Eligible pts with R/R LBCL underwent leukapheresis (followed by optional bridging therapy) and conditioning chemotherapy, then a single axi-cel infusion. Pts received corticosteroid prophylaxis (once-daily oral dexamethasone 10 mg on Days 0 [before axi-cel], 1, and 2) and earlier corticosteroids and/or tocilizumab for CRS and NE management vs Cohorts 1+2 (Oluwole, et al. Br J Haematol. 2021). The primary endpoints were incidence and severity of CRS and NEs. Secondary endpoints included ORR (investigator-assessed), duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell levels in blood. Result(s): As of December 16, 2021, the median follow-up time for the 40 treated pts was 26.9 mo. Since the 1-y analysis, no new CRS events were reported (no pts had Grade >=3 CRS to date). The incidence of Grade >=3 NEs increased from 15% to 18%between the 1-y and 2-y analyses. Two new NEs occurred in 2 pts: 1 pt had Grade 2 dementia (onset on Day 685 and ongoing at time of data cutoff;not related to axi-cel) and 1 had Grade 5 axi-cel-related leukoencephalopathy. Since the 1-y analysis, 6 new infections were reported (Grades 1, 2, and 5 COVID-19 [n=1 each], Grade 3 Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia [n=1], Grade 3 unknown infectious episode with inflammatory syndrome [n=1], and Grade 2 herpes zoster [n=1]). In total, 8 deaths occurred since the 1-y analysis (progressive disease [n=5], leukoencephalopathy [n=1], and COVID-19 [n=2]). The ORR was 95% (80% CR), which was unchanged from the 1-y analysis. Median DOR and PFS were since reached (25.9 mo [95% CI, 7.8-not estimable] and 26.8 mo [95% CI, 8.7-not estimable], respectively). Median OS was still not reached. Kaplan- Meier estimates of the 2-y DOR, PFS, and OS rates were 53%, 53%, and 62%, respectively. Of 18 pts (45%) in ongoing response at data cutoff, all achieved CR as the best response. By Month 24, 14/20 pts with evaluable samples (70%) had detectable CAR T cells (vs 23/36 pts [64%] in Cohorts 1+2). Conclusion(s): With 2 y of follow-up, the ZUMA-1 Cohort 6 toxicity management strategy continued to demonstrate an improved long-term safety profile of axi-cel in pts with R/R LBCL. Further, responses remained high, durable, and similar to those observed in Cohorts 1+2 (Locke, et al. Lancet Oncol. 2019).Copyright © 2023 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy
ABSTRACT
Background: The use of cryopreservation for stem cell grafts for both autologous stem cell and allogeneic cord blood transplant has been utilized for years. For other allogeneic stem cell transplant sources, the use of fresh collected grafts has been preferred due to concerns that cryopreservation may result in impaired graft function. With the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic a shift was made at our institution to exclusive use of cryopreservation Methods: In this retrospective single-center analysis a total of 133 patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplant at the University of Minnesota between 1/2018-6/2021 for a variety of malignancies were included, with 62 patients receiving fresh stem cell product and 71 patients receiving frozen stem cell product. Univariate statistical analysis was performed. Result(s): There was no significant difference between the two groups with regards to product type, sex, age, diagnosis (acute leukemia vs other), disease risk index, conditioning regimen, Karnofsky score, co-morbidity index, or cell dose (Table 1). Donor type was notably different between the two groups (p<0.01): matched sibling grafts were more commonly used for fresh products than frozen (85% vs. 35%), while matched unrelated donors were used more frequently for frozen than for fresh products (54% vs. 6%). Use of frozen product was associated with delayed neutrophil and platelet engraftment compared to fresh (median days to engraftment 15 vs 12 for neutrophils, 23 vs 17 for platelets, p<0.01 for both). Two-year relapse rates were significantly lower for frozen products (4%) than fresh (24%) (Table 2). This may be partially attributable to differences in follow up between the groups, as fresh products had a total of 910 days of follow up vs 432 for frozen products (P<0.0001). The difference in follow up remained statistically significant if the data was censored at 730 days (P<0.0001). Of note, the use of frozen products was associated with a lower rate of chronic graft-versus-host disease at one year post-transplant (p<0.01). There was no significant difference in the rates of acute GVHD between the groups. There were significant differences in GVHD prophylaxis regimens between the fresh and frozen groups (p<0.01). (Figure Presented)Two-year overall survival did not differ between groups (p=0.96). Conclusion(s): Use of cryopreserved stem cell products is associated with similar efficacy and outcomes as those seen with the use of fresh stem cell products. Although the data presented here suggest novel finding of decreased risk of relapse and chronic GVHD with the use of frozen stem cell products, additional follow up may abrogate these differences. Regardless, the logistical benefits of cryopreservation make this an attractive option for continued use in allogeneic transplants and our data presented here suggests that cryopreserved products remain an appropriate option for allogeneic stem cell transplant.Copyright © 2023 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy
ABSTRACT
Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo- HSCT) has traditionally involves administering fresh peripheral blood or bone marrow stem cells. At onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020, the National Marrow Donor Program (NDMP) mandated cryopreservation of all unrelated peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) products to prevent interruptions in transplant plans by donor COVID-19 infection after recipient's start of conditioning chemotherapy. Since the lifting of this mandate, many centers have continued to cryopreserve grafts prior to initiation of conditioning, but the longer-term clinical outcomes of this practice including chronic graft versus host disease (cGVHD) rates of patients receiving cryopreserved stem cells have not been previously well described. Prior work has raised concern for a deleterious effect of cryopreservation on overall survival and non-relapse mortality (PMID: 33865804). However, heterogeneity in the patient population and reason for cryopreservation suggest that further study is needed to assess these outcomes. Here we report our single-institution experience of clinical outcomes using cryopreserved versus fresh URD PBSCs for allo-HSCT. We examined long-term outcomes in 387 patients who received unrelated donor (URD) PBSCs (136 cryopreserved, 251 fresh) between January 1, 2019 and July 31, 2021. The cohorts had similar baseline characteristics including donor/recipient age/sex, disease, conditioning regimen/intensity, and GVHD prophylaxis regimens. Two-year OS, PFS, relapse, NRM, and acute GVHD rates were not different between recipients of fresh versus cryopreserved PBSCs. Strikingly, 2-year incidence of cGVHD (28% vs 52%, p=0.00001) and moderate/severe cGVHD (9% vs 24%, p=0.00016) was substantially lower in recipients of cryopreserved PBSCs compared to fresh, respectively (Figure 1). This difference was only noted in patients receiving a GVHD prophylaxis regimen without post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCY) (no PTCY 2-year cGVHD incidence cryopreserved vs fresh: 29% vs 57%, p=0.000016), moderate/severe cGVHD 16% vs 34%, p=0.0006) (Figure 2). For patients receiving a PTCY-containing GVHD prophylaxis regimen, there was no difference in cGVHD incidence (cGVHD cryopreserved vs fresh: 24% vs 27%, p=0.56, moderate/severe cGVHD 7% vs 9.3%, p=0.3, Figure 3). (Figure Presented) (Figure Presented) (Figure Presented) While survival and relapse rates are not different, cryopreservation is associated with a marked reduction in cGVHD rates in the setting of non-PTCy based GVHD prophylaxis. Larger multicenter or registry analyses are needed to confirm these observations and may prompt a re-assessment of the role of cryopreservation of stem cell products in clinical practice. If confirmed, it will be critical to understand the immunologic consequences of cryopreservation and how they might influence the clinical impact on chronic GVHDCopyright © 2023 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy